Post by prantogomes141 on Feb 14, 2024 2:01:10 GMT -6
Pinkett: I am genuinely concerned about the trends we are witnessing that relate to DEI. From the coopting of DEI to the corruption of critical race theory to legislation aimed at limiting discussions of race, privilege, systemic inequities and oppression in schools to bans of related books in libraries to anti-wokeness, we are now in an era of “reversity,” or organized resistance to diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. I think this is far more than bad; it is perilous to our democracy and our society. Perhaps what troubles me the most is the way these efforts are being framed: that DEI is meant to “indoctrinate” people when it is meant to liberate them; that DEI seeks to “rewrite our history,” when it is designed to balance how our history is told; and that DEI is divisive, when it is – both in words and in deeds – meant to be inclusive.
Said differently, the framing of these efforts is a misrepresentation of what DEI stands for and, ironically, an obfuscation of my firm belief that most people are seeking the same fundamental and shared principles of fairness, equality, justice and human dignity for all. It is Honduras Telemarketing Data my hope that no matter which perceived side a company believes it must take or choose to take, that all companies can uplift these principles – no matter what words are used describe them, whether it is diversity, equity and inclusion or otherwise – and, in doing so, reconstitute the fabric of our democracy and society.Pinkett: I am genuinely concerned about the trends we are witnessing that relate to DEI.
From the coopting of DEI to the corruption of critical race theory to legislation aimed at limiting discussions of race, privilege, systemic inequities and oppression in schools to bans of related books in libraries to anti-wokeness, we are now in an era of “reversity,” or organized resistance to diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. I think this is far more than bad; it is perilous to our democracy and our society. Perhaps what troubles me the most is the way these efforts are being framed: that DEI is meant to “indoctrinate” people when it is meant to liberate them; that DEI seeks to “rewrite our history,” when it is designed to balance how our history is told; and that DEI is divisive, when it is – both in words and in deeds – meant to be inclusive.
Said differently, the framing of these efforts is a misrepresentation of what DEI stands for and, ironically, an obfuscation of my firm belief that most people are seeking the same fundamental and shared principles of fairness, equality, justice and human dignity for all. It is Honduras Telemarketing Data my hope that no matter which perceived side a company believes it must take or choose to take, that all companies can uplift these principles – no matter what words are used describe them, whether it is diversity, equity and inclusion or otherwise – and, in doing so, reconstitute the fabric of our democracy and society.Pinkett: I am genuinely concerned about the trends we are witnessing that relate to DEI.
From the coopting of DEI to the corruption of critical race theory to legislation aimed at limiting discussions of race, privilege, systemic inequities and oppression in schools to bans of related books in libraries to anti-wokeness, we are now in an era of “reversity,” or organized resistance to diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. I think this is far more than bad; it is perilous to our democracy and our society. Perhaps what troubles me the most is the way these efforts are being framed: that DEI is meant to “indoctrinate” people when it is meant to liberate them; that DEI seeks to “rewrite our history,” when it is designed to balance how our history is told; and that DEI is divisive, when it is – both in words and in deeds – meant to be inclusive.